TCTphantom
formerly MX42
The Crown Tundra had issues, but they felt less like they came from the drops themselves. There is a long list of reasons Gen VIII OU was not as popular as USUM for example: putting the blame on just a soft reset of drops is disingenuous as heck. You could list several reasons SwSh wasn't as popular: the metagame was slower, megas were gone, dexit, Dynamax being banned turned off casuals, what have you. You can make several arguments about why Gen 8 wasn't beloved. Putting such a massive onus on a chaotic two months isn't it.i wholeheartedly agree with this. dropping a whole bunch of banned mons at once absolutely ruined crown tundra and was basically the final nail in the coffin for gen 8 because by the time we cleaned it up no one was interested anymore. doing the same thing this time would be a repeat of a terrible mistake and a massive disservice to all of the people who worked hard for their suspect reqs. each thing should be surveyed before dropping and each drop should be a suspect instead of a council vote unless there is overwhelming community support for a drop
I actually think a soft reset is not only a good idea, but a necessary one. The biggest reason for it is Tera.
With everything the council has said, it feels like a safe assumption to say we will revisit Tera in some way shape or form in DLC 2 after dealing with the immediate problems. Even if we just see some consensus compromise taken on Tera, that could be enough to change the entire playing field and would make some of our bans be worth revisiting. For example, is Tera on Team Preview enough for us to consider unbanning Bax? Would a full Tera Ban make Firepon a palatable drop? These are valid questions to consider when we are looking at our metagame going forward. Tera has such a stranglehold over the generation, and for good reason. It is our defining mechanic for the generation. It has, well, defined the generation. If we see anything happen to it, we need to reconsider our bans.
Even without that, there is logic for a soft reset. The fact of the matter is DLC2 is effectively going to be the "full launch" of SV as a generation, at least given the precedent of the Crown Tundra. Gen IX is effectively going to open up as a metagame once the Indigo Disk drops. Some things might still be busted when we look at things with or without Tera. I fail to see Flutter Mane, Chi Yu, or Iron Bundle being healthy for the tier no matter what. But depending on how the meta shifts and what is done with Tera, it can easily be worth letting things into the tier again. I think framing it as some sort of massive disservice is a massive overreaction. The worst case scenario is that Gen IX has a chaotic two months or so, which is not the end of the world.
If anything, I think a soft reset might bring in players even moreso than it would push people away. If we drop a bunch of spicy stuff and are looking at Tera first and foremost, there's a good shot we can bring in more interest into the tier. The Tera suspect we did at the start of the generation was one of the closest and most engaged suspects we have ever had. Having a wide swath of content would be a great way of enticing new people or returning players back into the tier.
Honestly, I think a fresh slate is what the tier needs. Tera more or less is the original sin of the tier. If we act on it in any way, shape, or form, a ton of our balance decisions are going to be worth putting under a microscope. For example, I might despise Espathra with a fiery passion, but without Tera it would be a very flawed mon. Mons like Annihilape, Regieleki, Chien Pao, Zamazenta Crowned, Firepon, Volcarona, and Urshifu Rapid Strike were in some way, shape, or form banned due to Tera. Would some of those be problematic or potentially scary without Tera? Sure, but it would be a lot harder to gauge.
If I had full dictatorial control, here is what I would drop
I could even be tempted into dropping depending on what direction we go with Tera. I think unbans like in the Crown Tundra are a great way to engage the playerbase and get useful data towards future policy decisions. Even if hypothetically in a metagame that keeps Tera we ban all but Volcarona and Darkrai from that list, I still would say it would be a worthwhile endeavor. Having data from when a pokemon is in the tier is a good thing, especially for making decisions in the future.
I feel like the actual result will be somewhere in the middle. Likely the council will not drop *everything*, but I think acting like a soft reset is the death knell for the tier is just setting yourself up for disappointment at best.