I won't reject my own analysis (I don't think that's a thing), but I'm posting to say that after reviewing C&C standards with several QC members and moderators that I agree with the rejections. While Durant may be usable (see: Dual Screens support, which makes a lot of questionable things "usable"), it's not the best, most reliable choice for an OU sweeper, no matter how powerful and fast it may be. Its sources of competition, namely Scizor alongside other late-game sweepers, are simply far more reliable and don't need as much team support to function. While it's possible to build a team around Durant, it's not really a smart choice in a serious match in which you can't always rely on the full level of support that Durant requires to function.
In other words, it's not ideal for a truly competitive team, nor is it worthy of an analysis.
I know it's weird seeing the author of the analysis say all of this after it's progressed so far, but again, as Ash Borer stated above me, there's been a shift in the standard of analyses.