There are ways of countering that, and in doubles I have to imagine its easier.Everyone will just spam sleep then...
It was my idea :( <sorta; most of it>I'm in.
I think it should be Showdown rules (the rules goodboner posted).
Erm...if we're playing with item clause then we have Chesto Berry and Lum Berry. As well, the Smeargle + Bronzong set up requires trick room, which means you can have something Safeguard as Smeargle Protects and Bronzong Trick Rooms.Everyone will just spam sleep then...
Ahahaha, I win.
4v4.
Showdown all the way (especially for people who can't go...like me...Canada >.>).
6v6 can also be duos...I don't see how changing the number of pokemon suggests there would be more synergy.
I'm not complaining about the short battles, and since it's WiFi. The animations are going to take a helluva long time for 4 pokemon. However, if people do complain about "short battles", then you can obviously make it out of 3. Which would most likely take the same time as a normal "competitive" battle.
Whats the point? You already know their team, unless you want to make 3 separate teams.i second that, 4v4 with best two out of three
yeah, three teams, like in that battle tower tourneyWhats the point? You already know their team, unless you want to make 3 separate teams.
I think 4v4 though.