you've made literally one post and you're already worse than whitequeenYou should all agree to and play CC1v1 instead of the tiers set forth in the tournament, seems legit!
i assumed it was a joke, such as the joke that is this thread title and the OP that lists everyone playing DPP UU. i also assumed i wouldn't have to tag two quite intelligent tournament players to let them know that they can't play a tier that isn't a part of this tournament. i'll make sure next time that i should be the most robotic and annoying host ever and remind people who make jokes that jokes are evil and not allowed in my funless tournament. *shakes fist* /sI don't understand that. New Breed posted that he was playing BW2 RU vs SV, which both agreed on, on Monday and for it now being almost Friday, no one decided to speak up until now. Two players that agreed to play that tier being declined because you "can't genuinely allow them to play whatever you agree to without compromising the tournament" just feels illogical at this point. If that was the case, wouldn't the TD that was hosting the SPL shake and blunder played would have made the same comment as zeb did to stop such a game? The TDs had almost five days to make a prevention when it really should have only took one. There isn't anything that compromises the tournament when Shake and blunders xy ru game 2 SPLs ago didn't have any sort of conflict and was also deemed official, so why should the BW2 RU game be any different besides "I wasn't hosting SPL during that time?" The TD that was hosting clearly showed that it was fine to play that tier as long as both players agreed it was okay, and if I'm not mistaken, there are no rules against that nor enforced.
I'm not trying to jab at you zeb, I just think this decision feels like it was too late to make at this point in time because of past minor evidence as well as the consent of both players participating.
.I don't understand that. New Breed posted that he was playing BW2 RU vs SV, which both agreed on, on Monday and for it now being almost Friday, no one decided to speak up until now. Two players that agreed to play that tier being declined because you "can't genuinely allow them to play whatever you agree to without compromising the tournament" just feels illogical at this point. If that was the case, wouldn't the TD that was hosting the SPL shake and blunder played would have made the same comment as zeb did to stop such a game? The TDs had almost five days to make a prevention when it really should have only took one. There isn't anything that compromises the tournament when Shake and blunders xy ru game 2 SPLs ago didn't have any sort of conflict and was also deemed official, so why should the BW2 RU game be any different besides "I wasn't hosting SPL during that time?" The TD that was hosting clearly showed that it was fine to play that tier as long as both players agreed it was okay, and if I'm not mistaken, there are no rules against that nor enforced.
I'm not trying to jab at you zeb, I just think this decision feels like it was too late to make at this point in time because of past minor evidence as well as the consent of both players participating.
so me and ifm can play DPP UU rightbut yea there's many reasons to draw the line here, i can't genuinely allow you to just play whatever you agree to without compromising the tournament. sorry folks
At this rate you need a third Identity.i think we gonna need a new spl host for next yr at this rate